Eval
Against the client's dataset, not benchmarks.
AI agents that execute multi-step tasks with reasoning. Critical actions are always signed off by a human until the confidence threshold is exceeded.
There is a class of tasks — classify, decide, execute steps in sequence, call external systems, synthesise — that current language models handle well with the right agent architecture. E-commerce returns, invoice reading and logging, quotes, first-level support, reconciliation.
We build agents with LangGraph, Anthropic and OpenAI models, and always with a validation layer. The critical action — the one that costs money or exposes the client — is signed off by a human until the model demonstrates statistical stability above the threshold.
In closed pilots, we achieved 78% autonomous resolution on fashion e-commerce returns, with an error rate below 1.5% and a cost per case of €0.28 versus €8.40 for a human agent.
Against the client's dataset, not benchmarks.
Agent with tools, validation and escalation.
4–6 weeks in production with monitoring.
Deployment if the eval justifies it.
The operational detail: what we deliver as part of the engagement and what we keep active afterwards.
Reasoning agents
Returns, support, reconciliation, invoices, quotes.
Proprietary eval framework
On the client's dataset. Business metrics.
Human in the loop
Critical action with a path to a human.
Continuous monitoring
Accuracy, latency, cost, scaling.
ERP and CRM integration
Via Summum Sistemas.
AI Act documentation
Annex IV where applicable.
Agents may fall under the AI Act high-risk system category.
Production agents are not just AI: ERP, regulatory and SOC.
We do not charge for implementation. It is contractual.
It usually reassigns. The team moves to complex queues.
Multi-model. Claude for reasoning, GPT-4 for vision.